Mountain flying, density altitude, and the AA-1 Yankee
9 July 2007
After some deep thoughts on these three important crossing-the-Rockies factors, I’ve decided to hold off on my coast-to-coast trip – at least until this (abnormally hot) summer is over. As my dad pointed out when I told him my decision the other day, cross-country planning is about two things: where to fly, and when to fly.
Those of you who are not pilots have likely never even heard of density altitude, but it affects reciprocating engines of all kinds. Air density is a major factor in engine performance, which is directly related to how dense the air is: the more air available to an engine, the more horsepower it will produce. On a given day, air pressure decreases with altitude, reducing power output, but higher temperatures and humid air reduce air density further. This effective altitude, as a result of temperature and humidity, is what we call Density Altitude; the engine simply performs like it is much higher than it actually is. A car crossing a mountain pass on a hot day will see a slight drop in power, but to an airplane thousands of feet in the air the effects will be far more obvious.
Climb and takeoff performance suffers accordingly. Yesterday’s high in Missoula was 90° F, and late last week it reached 104° F; these numbers have been doubling its absolute altitude of 3,205 feet to a density altitude of at least 6,500 feet. Our Yankee, which will clear an obstacle in 1,440 feet on a standard day (59° F) at sea level, would require at least 3,600 feet on a humid 100° day in Missoula. Turbochargers help combat density altitude performance losses by increasing the air density at the intake… unfortunately, the Yankee is not turbocharged.
American Aviation’s AA-1A manual is a mere 41 pages long, compared to the 150 or 200 page manuals found in modern Pipers and Cessnas, but it has enough data to let me make an informed decision about cross-country flights. On a ‘standard’ day, the air temperature at 9,000 feet would be below freezing, and the Yankee would still be able to climb at 350 feet per minute. Last week’s temperatures at 9,000 averaged around 60° F; climb performance in the AA-1, if it could even get there to begin with, would be awful. It’s a great plane for cruising around, but the stubby wings and O-235 engine can’t handle the hot, humid, and high conditions the rockies produce. I’ll make the big trip later, and occupy myself with less ambitious trips up and down the West coast.
Read these comments
Great post Eric, thanks. I knew of density altitude but didn’t realise it could affect performance this much. I assumed “hot and high” was only really a consideration during take-off near MTOW.
Hey, Steven! Yeah, it really depends on the aircraft or engine. I have no real experience (or operating handbooks) but for a turboprop or turbine engine it’s probably not until near max gross that things really become apparent. In a normally aspirated Yankee or Cessna 152 with 108 horsepower, you’re gonna see the effects a lot sooner!
fly me to vegas.
Only if you can win big.
You could always taxi up and down the mountains!
I’m not actually convinced that would work very well – not enough torque! :P
Hi
could you explain to me how you figure your density altitude for your trip with an example. Also I have always been confused with presurre altitude. I understand the definition, but when you are in your plane flying and you read the indicated altitude would that be the pressure alt or is it the true alt. OR do you subtract the pressure reading in your Kollsman widow at the alt you are flying with your Bari metric pressure reading which you got on the ground from takeoff. Really confused can you help me out with an example .
Regards
Chris